not quite
Posted by John Vidale on April 18, 2004 at 18:11:26:

Chris,

As I recall, their Science paper showed that the motions would be much worse for a realistic basin structure than for a structure with no basin. However, the engineers already include such site effects in their estimates of ground response in basins. The data close in to past large earthquakes was very sparse, but I don't recall that it strongly underpredicted the shaking.

Maybe you're thinking of Somerville's argument that directivity could make motions much worse than expected for places in line with the direction of rupture. That argument is probably right.

John


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: not quite - chris in suburbia  08:46:03 - 4/19/2004  (21559)  (1)
        ● there was some prior work - John Vidale  10:42:10 - 4/19/2004  (21560)  (1)
           ● Re: there was some prior work - Cathryn  22:20:39 - 4/22/2004  (21583)  (1)
              ● Sylmar quake - John Vidale  22:11:00 - 4/23/2004  (21594)  (1)
                 ● Re: Sylmar quake - Cathryn  13:59:42 - 4/24/2004  (21611)  (1)
                    ● SM mountains - John Vidale  09:01:59 - 4/26/2004  (21623)  (0)