Re: not quite
Posted by chris in suburbia on April 19, 2004 at 08:46:03:

John, you may or may not be correct-I have not read the Science paper in a couple of years. But, I think that paper was the first time that it showed that the waves would bounce around and amplify for, I think, over a minute. Also, I don't think that the strong motions along the Santa Monica fault for the Northridge earthquake would have been predicted before hand (basin edge effect). But, I'm not a seismologist and you are....Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● there was some prior work - John Vidale  10:42:10 - 4/19/2004  (21560)  (1)
        ● Re: there was some prior work - Cathryn  22:20:39 - 4/22/2004  (21583)  (1)
           ● Sylmar quake - John Vidale  22:11:00 - 4/23/2004  (21594)  (1)
              ● Re: Sylmar quake - Cathryn  13:59:42 - 4/24/2004  (21611)  (1)
                 ● SM mountains - John Vidale  09:01:59 - 4/26/2004  (21623)  (0)