Re: EQF: an alternate solution
Posted by EQF on October 16, 2003 at 17:25:38:

Roger, I am not especially concerned about what anyone thinks concerning Ear Tones being significant or not. What I am simply saying is that I would like to be able to discuss them here without World War III getting started as has happened in the past.

For more information regarding Ear Tones heard by different people you can examine the following report:

http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/134.html

My own Ear Tones have the code RET for a tone heard in the right ear and LET for one heard in the left ear. The ones marked SET are for “submitted” Ear Tones. Those times were sent to me by another person.

In most cases we heard Ear Tones at different times. As you can see I also hear many more than that person. However there were a few striking agreements. In those cases it appeared to me that we probably both heard Ear Tones for the same earthquake even though we live a considerable distance from one another.

Also, as I have said, this subject matter does appear to me to have an important research potential. I have already obtained a number of technical opinions regarding the Ear Tone signals from researchers around the world. Some of those opinions regarding the source of the signals would send a chill down your spine.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQF: an alternate solution - Cathryn  20:04:20 - 10/18/2003  (19781)  (0)
     ● Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus  17:50:56 - 10/16/2003  (19711)  (1)
        ● Re: Wrong Methodology - EQF  18:10:38 - 10/16/2003  (19712)  (1)
           ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus  18:42:59 - 10/16/2003  (19716)  (1)
              ● Re: Wrong Methodology - EQF  20:18:49 - 10/16/2003  (19719)  (1)
                 ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Petra Challus  21:09:07 - 10/16/2003  (19721)  (1)
                    ● Re: Wrong Methodology - Canie  07:48:46 - 10/17/2003  (19733)  (1)
                       ● Excessive arguments - EQF  13:53:54 - 10/17/2003  (19738)  (2)
                          ● Re: Excessive arguments - Cathryn  20:34:58 - 10/18/2003  (19782)  (1)
                             ● Re: EFU - Petra  23:36:53 - 10/18/2003  (19783)  (2)
                                ● Re: EFU - Kate  13:20:05 - 10/20/2003  (19790)  (0)
                                ● Re: EFU - Cathryn  16:00:43 - 10/19/2003  (19789)  (0)
                          ● Yada, Yada, Yada...Have it, it yours - Petra Challus  14:14:56 - 10/17/2003  (19741)  (1)
                             ● Earthquake housing project - EQF  15:35:33 - 10/17/2003  (19746)  (1)
                                ● Re: Earthquake housing project - Petra Challus  19:21:49 - 10/17/2003  (19750)  (0)