skepticism would be appropriate
Posted by John Vidale on October 10, 2003 at 18:30:40:

The most likely explanation for the trend is that there are several centers of seismic activity, like Tonga or a major aftershock zone, that have these apparently special distances as their separation. To discard this possibility, one should compare time-scrambled catalogues with the real catalog, or examine which event-pairs are occurring for the special distances.

I'm particularly skeptical because these distances do not correspond to much, if any, amplification of the seismic waves.

I don't have time to pursue this myself.

John


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: skepticism would be appropriate - chris in suburbia  06:33:16 - 10/11/2003  (19645)  (2)
        ● CORRECTION - chris in suburbia  05:07:02 - 10/14/2003  (19675)  (0)
        ● Chris; new file on its' way - Roger Hunter  19:02:03 - 10/11/2003  (19646)  (1)
           ● following on John's caution - chris in suburbia  07:58:26 - 10/12/2003  (19648)  (1)
              ● needs to be done by computer - chris in suburbia  08:09:20 - 10/12/2003  (19649)  (0)