Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate
Posted by Don in Hollister on May 03, 2003 at 20:41:41:

Hi EQF. As no one knows how to use your data how can they even begin to get the location of the next major quake. You yourself say you do not know when or where they will occur. You go on to say that you expect that they will be reported in the news and plan to try to let people know when that has happened. I don’t think anyone needs you tell them when that has happened. Most certainly those at the location the quake won’t need anyone to tell them what has happened. As far as the rest of the world goes they can watch the boob tube just like everyone else does.

You state, “the chart data show that the precursor signals were detected and the earthquake occurred at times when most of the waves such as Earth acceleration and Solid Earth Tide strength were near their peak values.” How do I know that? I don’t see anything there that indicated where and when the next destructive quake would occur.

Then you state, “the less important moon gravity strengths had different values. It cannot be seen on this present chart, but geomagnetic field activity was fairly strong at the time that the earthquake occurred.” How is that supposed to indicate where the next major quake is going to occur?

You go on to state; “Three precursor signals were detected shortly after that destructive May 1, 2003 earthquake occurred in Turkey. I find that something like that happens quite often. My first analysis points to an occurrence time for one of the earthquakes around the end of the first week in May. However, the research data charts at my Web sites show that occurrence times can be delayed for months as that May 1 Turkey earthquake was.”

It seems to me that all your doing is waiting for the quake to occur then you draw your line and tell everyone this is the precursor to this, or that quake. No matter how many times I look at your chart I can’t see anything there that would indicate where the next major quake is going to occur. I see nothing significant about 2003/02/01 that indicates a quake is going to occur in Turkey on 2003/05/01.

You state, “The following are my data for the signals. In many cases the data for the top signal will match the same type data for the earthquake itself as happened with that Turkey earthquake. That is one of the ways that I determine that the earthquake has occurred. In other cases the top signal will match those types of data for some past earthquake which occurred at the same location.”

That is one of the ways that I determine the quake has occurred. What your saying is that you didn’t know where the quake was going to occur. You have to wait for the quake to occur before you can predict that it’s going to occur.

03/05/01 B 45 46 13 90 46 7 9 1 45 43 -5 406513 15N 137E 11N 134E 12N 135E 12N 135E
03/05/01 B 36 37 4 81 37 7 9 1 36 34 -6 406509 15N 146E 11N 143E 12N 144E 12N 144E
03/05/01 C 24 25 81 69 24 7 9 1 23 21 -6 406503 15N 159E 10N 155E 12N 156E 12N 157E

From the above data tell my where the next major quake is going to occur. That is if you can. Take Care…Don in creepy town



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate - EQF  09:15:56 - 5/4/2003  (18583)  (3)
        ● Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate - Roger Hunter  17:37:03 - 5/5/2003  (18597)  (1)
           ● Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate - EQF  20:50:02 - 5/5/2003  (18599)  (1)
              ● Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate - Don in Hollister  01:23:38 - 5/6/2003  (18600)  (0)
        ● Re: An earthquake or two for people to try to locate - Don in Hollister  21:16:52 - 5/4/2003  (18587)  (0)
        ● Re: A Fools Paradise - Petra Challus  12:10:48 - 5/4/2003  (18585)  (0)