|
|
|
|
| Re: A test for you. |
Roger: "Better" for what purpose? As you know, windows with fewer quakes give lower apparent odds for success. Why wouldn't the entire timeline of data be used (vs sliding them around to caputre or miss clusters)?
Follow Ups: ● Re: A test for you. - Roger Hunter 05:00:48 - 10/7/2002 (16921) (2) ● Re: A test for you...Roger - 2cents 13:42:44 - 10/7/2002 (16930) (1) ● Re: A test for you...Roger - Roger Hunter 14:04:13 - 10/7/2002 (16934) (0) ● Re: A test for you. - Mary C. 05:56:47 - 10/7/2002 (16924) (1) ● Re: A test for you. - Roger Hunter 11:48:28 - 10/7/2002 (16927) (2) ● Re: A test for you. - Mary C. 14:13:01 - 10/7/2002 (16937) (1) ● Re: A test for you. - Roger Hunter 14:42:28 - 10/7/2002 (16938) (0) ● Context must be assumed to answer the question. - 2cents 13:52:03 - 10/7/2002 (16931) (1) ● Re: Context must be assumed to answer the question. - Roger Hunter 14:08:22 - 10/7/2002 (16935) (0) ● Re: A test for you. - Petra Challus 20:41:40 - 10/6/2002 (16918) (1) ● Re: A test for you. - Roger Hunter 05:02:55 - 10/7/2002 (16922) (1) ● Re: A test for you. Unaccepting Of Failure - Petra Challus 18:21:00 - 10/7/2002 (16944) (2) ● Re: A test for you. Unaccepting Of Failure - Roger Hunter 19:03:30 - 10/7/2002 (16949) (1) ● Re: A test for you. Unaccepting Of Failure - Roger Hunter 19:06:21 - 10/7/2002 (16950) (0) ● Re: A test for you. Unaccepting Of Failure - Roger Hunter 18:51:01 - 10/7/2002 (16947) (1) ● Re: A test for you. The Answer - Petra Challus 21:15:18 - 10/7/2002 (16951) (1) ● Re: A test for you. The Answer - Roger Hunter 04:06:42 - 10/8/2002 (16955) (0) |
|
|
|
|
