|
Re: Planned Philippines earthquake report |
Hi E, I know we travel in different circles. Mine are the ones that know the protocols of what is acceptable and those that are not. The chicken that crows at midnight might be a warning signal, the snake that crosses the road, the dog that hugs its owners legs, or the fish that jump from the ponds. But absolutely none of them can be used in a formalized acceptable earthquake forecast or prediction. Just suppose five people predict an earthquake in China for tomorrow, but they never get another hit for years. Is it any good? Will anyone listen if they only have one right prediction? No. They need repeatable results. This is what you need to work on and form a plan for it to take a minimum of three years. When you have achieved this, then you can take pride in the work. Petra Follow Ups: ● Re: Planned Philippines earthquake report - EQF 00:35:47 - 3/8/2002 (13505) (1) ● Claims - Lowell 01:46:34 - 3/8/2002 (13507) (2) ● Re: Claims - EQF 19:11:25 - 3/9/2002 (13537) (0) ● Re: Update From The Archives - Petra Challus 08:39:21 - 3/8/2002 (13510) (1) ● Re: Update From The Archives - EQF 19:11:37 - 3/9/2002 (13538) (0) |
|