|
Amit reevaluated |
Hi all; Since Amit has pointed out errors in my list of his predictions I have compared my list for 2012 and 2013 to the archived predictions. There were indeed some errors of omission, adding 5 dates to the list. Rerunning the evaluation showed he had one additional hit for 6.5+ quakes, bringing his results to exactly chance level. Not much help there, Amit. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Amit 13:56:25 - 10/30/2013 (101221) (2) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Skywise 17:19:49 - 10/30/2013 (101223) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 18:33:44 - 10/30/2013 (101224) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Skywise 19:06:27 - 10/30/2013 (101225) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 19:22:51 - 10/30/2013 (101226) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Skywise 20:19:23 - 10/30/2013 (101227) (2) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 21:23:07 - 10/30/2013 (101229) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Skywise 21:41:27 - 10/30/2013 (101230) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 23:11:33 - 10/30/2013 (101231) (1) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Skywise 00:50:08 - 10/31/2013 (101232) (0) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 21:21:51 - 10/30/2013 (101228) (0) ● Re: Amit reevaluated - Roger Hunter 15:42:19 - 10/30/2013 (101222) (0) |
|