Re: SONGS closed
Posted by Skywise on June 30, 2013 at 12:41:23:

Old news to us here in the area. It was almost literally "breaking news" when it was announced June 7th.

The reason is simple - not cost effective to repair. There's no guarantee that the money to repair will be recuperated before the next renewal date in 2022, and there's no guarantee it will be renewed. It's purely a business decision to cut losses.

And, nothing is replacing it. Instead, electricity will be imported on the grid, and the cost is expected to be passed on to consumers.

Methinks people need a crash course in cost-benefit analysis. They need to learn that the risks vs the need for electricity aren't what they think it is.

But then again, there's always rubbing two sticks together, right?

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: SONGS closed - Roger Hunter  12:48:38 - 6/30/2013  (100659)  (1)
        ● Re: SONGS closed - Skywise  13:04:49 - 6/30/2013  (100660)  (2)
           ● Re: SONGS closed - Canie  13:21:15 - 7/1/2013  (100665)  (2)
              ● Re: SONGS closed - Skywise  17:35:03 - 7/1/2013  (100670)  (0)
              ● Re: SONGS closed - Roger Hunter  13:48:17 - 7/1/2013  (100667)  (1)
                 ● Re: SONGS closed - Skywise  17:32:49 - 7/1/2013  (100669)  (0)
           ● Re: SONGS closed - Roger Hunter  13:28:15 - 6/30/2013  (100661)  (1)
              ● Re: SONGS closed - Skywise  17:55:57 - 6/30/2013  (100662)  (2)
                 ● Re: SONGS closed - Roger Hunter  19:58:56 - 6/30/2013  (100664)  (0)
                 ● Re: SONGS closed - Roger Hunter  19:58:39 - 6/30/2013  (100663)  (1)
                    ● Re: SONGS closed - Betrh  14:40:58 - 7/8/2013  (100685)  (1)
                       ● Re: SONGS closed - Skywise  16:23:28 - 7/8/2013  (100686)  (1)
                          ● Re: SONGS closed - Beth  15:14:52 - 7/10/2013  (100690)  (0)