Dear EQF,

I thing that there is not the atmosphere on this Forum for the discussion about EQ predictions. Make the analysis of the behaviour of this Forum during last week.
1) You put the info about our monograph:
Only neutral response (info about the contents of the book). No interest.

2) You put the info about the brief summary of tectonics plate mechanism:
There was a hard effort to discredit the hypothesis and reject it. Even without the knowledge of the background of it. Nobody knows our theoretical solution and measurement results. Some of discussing people here wants to reject even review of the book in advance.

3) One part of the theory is tidal triggering of EQs. I put on the net the picture with the California EQs distribution in the 3-D tidal phase space. No one question, no one review, no one discussion about this result. I read only the phrases as "tides can not trigger EQs", which I learned 30 years ago.

4) You put here the info about my prediction of Okhotsk sea EQ (Aug 14, 2012, M7.7) on August 13 in a bit simple way:
The response was "curious science". When I quoted from our mail from August 3, 2012 the parameters of my prediction, I did not obtain any response.
When I put on net the info about the success of 80% of our predictions, the response was to ridicule them.

5) I found that the PREDICTION board here is empty since 2009. I suppose that the aim of this board is to ridicule the authors of the predictions on the "scientific" basis. Nobody wants to know the background of your predictions and even the 14/17 successful predictions of Jim Berkland is denied.