|
Re: On the Lunar Onfluence of Earthquakes |
Well, he's gonna think what he wants to think. Nothing I can do about that, and not worth wasting time trying, IMNSHO. There's actually a couple items he mentioned recently that I'd question, but again, not worth my time. I am a bit surprised, though, that no one else picked up on them. Anyway, I just wanted to share some of my own thoughts on the topic. Contrary to what Ed and others may think, I am not "anti-prediction" or dogmatic or what-have-you. I don't just dismiss people's prediction ideas out of hand because I "don't think it can be done." On the contrary, I dismiss them with logic, reasoning, analysis, and facts. I think it's possible. I also think it hasn't been done yet. Someday. Maybe. Hopefully in my lifetime. That would be nice to see. Brian Follow Ups: ● Request for Canie – December 27, 2011 - EQF 05:41:02 - 12/27/2011 (79503) (1) ● Re: Request for Canie – December 27, 2011 - Skywise 12:04:48 - 12/27/2011 (79508) (0) ● Re: On the Lunar Onfluence of Earthquakes - Roger Hunter 20:50:36 - 12/26/2011 (79498) (1) ● we did include the fault orientation - John Vidale 21:46:22 - 12/26/2011 (79499) (1) ● Re: we did include the fault orientation - Skywise 22:13:53 - 12/26/2011 (79500) (0) |
|