Posted by Lowell on June 10, 2001 at 18:54:05:
An earthquake of Ml 5.0 occurred this morning in northwestern Washington state. Currently sources are saying this is NOT an aftershock of the Nisqually earthquake. It was felt as far away as Seattle. Current parameters for this shock are: 10JUN2001 06:19:11 (PDT) 47.166N 123.506W 40.5km ML=5.0 N of Satsop, WA http://www.geophys.washington.edu/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes0.html Several predictors may have anticipated this event including: Petra Challis - see Don's posting below. Petra had an ear tone which she interpreted as coming from one of five areas including Olympia Peninsula, Washington in mid-May. Anonymous - An anonymous predictor sent NGDC a seismic alert message specifically indicating the possibility of a mild to moderate earthquake between California and B.C. in the next three days. (a moderate earthquake is Ml 5-6). This forecast was made on the basis of a geomagnetic storm which began at 21:00 UT while the West Coast was directly under the sun (at 12 noon local time). This predictor believes the maximum seismic effects occur sub-solar and on the opposite side of the earth (anti-solar) when a geomagnetic storm begins. Incidentally, a Mb 5.6 occurred antisolar to Washington in Turkmenistan today as well. This alert was issued as of 03:00 UT this morning. The Washington earthquake occurred at 13:19 UT today. E.D.G. - An earthquake advisory issued last night was received from E.D.G. It was not specific to Washington state or the west Coast, although Southern California was mentioned. Lowell - See posting below regarding the possibility of moderate events on West Coast in the 3 days following strong meteoritically induced flooding on the Gulf of Mexico, posted yesterday evening. Now, if we could just put these types of warnings together before an event, maybe inroads could be made into forecasting a few earthquakes.
Follow Ups:
● I dun tink so.... - bobshannon.org 08:14:14 - 6/11/2001 (7921) (2)
● Re: I dun tink so.... Purpose & Intent - Petra Challus 12:33:14 - 6/11/2001 (7927) (0)
● Re: I dun tink so.... - Lowell 10:01:40 - 6/11/2001 (7925) (2)
● I Think So Re: I dun tink so....& NOT - mark 21:20:28 - 6/12/2001 (7956) (0)
● Re: I dun tink so.... - Roger Hunter 11:46:13 - 6/11/2001 (7926) (0)
|