Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011
Posted by Roger Hunter on July 06, 2011 at 20:37:32:

EQF;

Your equation is really too simple to predict anything.

But the main thing wrong is that it leaves out the most important factor, that being the amount of energy stored in the fault and the amount needed to get it moving.

To make matters worse, those quantities change with each quake.

So I don't think you'll get anywhere no matter who helps, which countries get involved or how fast the computers become.

You don't have the necessary input data and there's no affordable way to get it.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - EQF  22:10:39 - 7/6/2011  (78992)  (2)
        ● only half of the scientific process - John Vidale  08:18:43 - 7/7/2011  (78995)  (0)
        ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - Roger Hunter  07:10:52 - 7/7/2011  (78994)  (1)
           ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - EQF  20:17:49 - 7/7/2011  (79000)  (1)
              ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - Roger Hunter  20:52:11 - 7/7/2011  (79001)  (1)
                 ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - EQF  22:07:08 - 7/7/2011  (79002)  (1)
                    ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - Roger Hunter  22:33:00 - 7/7/2011  (79003)  (1)
                       ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - EQF  00:54:21 - 7/8/2011  (79005)  (1)
                          ● Re: Making Progress In Science + Earthquake Triggering Processes – June 6, 2011 - Jim W.  14:09:51 - 7/9/2011  (79007)  (0)