|
word count >>> evidence |
What a lot of bluster complaining that governments and scientists have no confidence in EQF's methods, which have not a scintilla of evidence that they work better than rolling dice. One could cut and paste this diatribe to argue that any crackpot idea is misunderstood genius. Is the idea of testing and demonstrating the effectiveness of your ideas anathema? Follow Ups: ● Re: word count >>> evidence - Roger Hunter 16:08:52 - 5/13/2011 (78802) (1) ● that's not statistics - John Vidale 16:27:57 - 5/13/2011 (78803) (1) ● Re: that's not statistics - Roger Hunter 17:00:01 - 5/13/2011 (78804) (1) ● Re: that's not statistics - heartland chris 18:34:21 - 5/13/2011 (78805) (1) ● Re: that's not statistics - Canie 20:28:43 - 5/13/2011 (78807) (0) |
|