EQF

> Even after all of this time you still don't understand what my earthquake warnings and advisories are saying. They are not the traditional type of warning that says that an earthquake will occur here or there at some time. Instead they say the following. And I have stated this repeatedly over the years.

Yes I know all that very well and still don't see any use for it.

> What my warnings say:

> "One or more strong EM Signals have been detected. They are believed to be associated with activity in fault zones that are getting ready to fracture. So, check your own earthquake warning data NOW to see if an earthquake might be approaching for your area."

First off, there are no reliable earthquake precursors to check. But if there were any, people would be watching them already and wouldn't need your warning.

> My Charts and Maps are basically probability based drawings that show where the expected earthquake might occur. They work some of the time.

Tossing a coin works some of the time.

> My data indicate to me that these EM Signals can be generated as much as a year or more before the earthquake occurs. But other people should be able to detect something even if the earthquake is a year away in some fault zone. Then they will at least know that one is getting ready to occur.

LOL! Name any seismic zone and wait a year. You'll get a hit nearly every time.

> Finally, I believe that I have probably just made an important "breakthrough" discovery with these EM Signals and will likely post another note about that some time in the next week.

We'll look forward to it.

Roger