comment on EQF post
Posted by heartland chris on January 26, 2010 at 16:23:09:

OK, EQF you asked for it. That was a worthless prediction and if your EM signals are "eartones", you should call them that. This is my personal opinion, put on a separate thread as you requested. What with Haiti, I've lost patience with your self-importance. I may do the same, but I've earned the right to be full of myself with publications in refereed journals.
Chris

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: comment on EQF post - Canie  11:11:17 - 1/27/2010  (76533)  (1)
        ● Re: comment on EQF post-Canie - heartland chris  11:18:42 - 1/27/2010  (76535)  (0)
     ● Re: comment on EQF post - EQF  20:01:00 - 1/26/2010  (76512)  (2)
        ● Re: comment on EQF post - Roger Hunter  21:14:21 - 1/26/2010  (76514)  (1)
           ● Saved Response Time January 27, 2010 - EQF  07:26:50 - 1/27/2010  (76517)  (0)
        ● Re: comment on EQF post - Skywise  20:43:51 - 1/26/2010  (76513)  (1)
           ● Re: comment on EQF post //  - Tony  08:40:41 - 1/27/2010  (76520)  (2)
              ● Re: comment on EQF post //  - Canie  11:02:48 - 1/27/2010  (76532)  (0)
              ● Re: comment on EQF post //  - Roger Hunter  08:57:44 - 1/27/2010  (76521)  (2)
                 ● Re: comment on EQF post //  - mrrabbit  09:35:33 - 1/27/2010  (76523)  (0)
                 ● impossible? - John Vidale  09:23:38 - 1/27/2010  (76522)  (3)
                    ● Re: impossible? - Roger Hunter  11:37:38 - 1/27/2010  (76536)  (0)
                    ● Re: impossible? - Tony  10:06:50 - 1/27/2010  (76526)  (1)
                       ● Re: impossible? - Skywise  20:32:07 - 1/27/2010  (76545)  (0)
                    ● Re: impossible? - heartland chris  09:43:40 - 1/27/2010  (76525)  (1)
                       ● Re: impossible? // I remember those days - Tony  10:08:03 - 1/27/2010  (76527)  (0)