Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model
Posted by Dennis Glasby on October 10, 2009 at 22:30:04:

Restating my position, 400 ppm of CO-2 is a significant part of global
temperature change but not the primary cause. Its probably
at least 3rd or 4th on the list. And yes we need to control the
CO-2 released into the atmosphere.

I post these dissenting scientist views to show that some of the
qualified science community has not bought the prevailing majority
consensus.

Dennis

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  21:19:45 - 10/11/2009  (76123)  (1)
        ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Skywise  23:50:44 - 10/11/2009  (76124)  (1)
           ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  05:31:02 - 10/12/2009  (76125)  (2)
              ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Skywise  19:47:32 - 10/12/2009  (76134)  (1)
                 ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:13:47 - 10/13/2009  (76135)  (1)
                    ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Skywise  20:19:37 - 10/13/2009  (76136)  (1)
                       ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  22:03:31 - 10/13/2009  (76137)  (0)
              ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - heartland chris  07:17:09 - 10/12/2009  (76126)  (1)
                 ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  09:06:03 - 10/12/2009  (76129)  (1)
                    ● Re: discussion of issues with CO2--Climate model - heartland chris  13:44:48 - 10/12/2009  (76133)  (0)