|
|
|
|
| Re: Project for Roger; first results |
Good work, Roger! But that ratio of 60/382 just begs for an explanation - or suggests some sort of error. It seems highly improbable! Mike Williams Follow Ups: ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - heartland chris 09:33:50 - 6/18/2008 (74047) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 11:30:27 - 6/18/2008 (74048) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 11:35:56 - 6/18/2008 (74049) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 15:35:37 - 6/18/2008 (74051) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 16:31:11 - 6/18/2008 (74054) (2) ● not a random test - John Vidale 08:07:52 - 6/21/2008 (74065) (1) ● Re: not a random test - Roger Hunter 09:19:15 - 6/21/2008 (74066) (1) ● Re: not a random test - John Vidale 10:37:07 - 6/21/2008 (74067) (1) ● Re: not a random test - Roger Hunter 10:53:25 - 6/21/2008 (74068) (2) ● Re: not a random test - marc / berkeley 14:25:12 - 6/24/2008 (74082) (1) ● Re: not a random test; Marc - Roger Hunter 15:42:11 - 6/24/2008 (74083) (0) ● he talks about many indicators - John Vidale 11:13:23 - 6/21/2008 (74069) (0) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn 08:38:54 - 6/19/2008 (74055) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 10:51:55 - 6/19/2008 (74056) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn 11:31:54 - 6/19/2008 (74057) (2) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 12:30:06 - 6/19/2008 (74059) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn 14:13:53 - 6/19/2008 (74060) (0) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Roger Hunter 12:27:10 - 6/19/2008 (74058) (1) ● Re: Project for Roger; first results - Cathryn 14:14:37 - 6/19/2008 (74061) (0) |
|
|
|
|
