An interesting situation
Posted by Roger Hunter on May 30, 2008 at 10:27:54:

Hi all;

I've been running subsets of the far field triggering quakes and I find that the phenomena persists. But it's the opposite of the published report results. I find an excess of quakes in the 5 hours before major quakes instead of after. So this is not triggering but what is it?

I've looked at 3 time ranges; 1973-2007, 1992-2007 and 2000-2007. For each time range I've looked at 7.0+ main quakes and 7.7+ main quakes.

In each case there are more distant (>1100km) quakes before the main quakes than after.

Maybe the distant quakes are triggering the big ones?

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● recent result of interest - John Vidale  10:33:03 - 5/31/2008  (73931)  (0)
     ● one explanation - John Vidale  19:08:41 - 5/30/2008  (73924)  (1)
        ● Re: one explanation - Roger Hunter  19:25:18 - 5/30/2008  (73926)  (1)
           ● Re: one explanation - Roger Hunter  22:30:07 - 5/30/2008  (73927)  (1)
              ● odd - John Vidale  07:02:49 - 5/31/2008  (73928)  (1)
                 ● Re: odd - Roger Hunter  07:42:17 - 5/31/2008  (73929)  (1)
                    ● need a baseline to spot an anomaly - John Vidale  09:25:40 - 5/31/2008  (73930)  (1)
                       ● Re: need a baseline to spot an anomaly - Roger Hunter  11:01:03 - 5/31/2008  (73932)  (0)
     ● Re: An interesting situation - Cathryn  18:48:43 - 5/30/2008  (73922)  (1)
        ● Re: An interesting situation - Roger Hunter  19:21:12 - 5/30/2008  (73925)  (0)