Re: Moat was 12 feet?
Posted by PennyB on December 28, 2007 at 13:51:41:

Can't recall---but apparently the measurements weren't all they were supposed to be. Low bid contracting? Cost cutting? Unskilled workmen? I dunno.

But you're right--the lawyers will be circling and waiting to tear something apart.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Moat was 12 feet? - Roger Hunter  14:01:36 - 12/28/2007  (73073)  (1)
        ● OK...No water in the moat? - Glen  14:48:12 - 12/28/2007  (73074)  (1)
           ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Roger Hunter  15:19:10 - 12/28/2007  (73075)  (1)
              ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Canie  16:44:05 - 12/28/2007  (73076)  (1)
                 ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:15:02 - 12/29/2007  (73078)  (1)
                    ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise  21:24:10 - 12/29/2007  (73087)  (1)
                       ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  21:37:26 - 12/29/2007  (73089)  (1)
                          ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise  21:41:06 - 12/30/2007  (73094)  (0)