|
Re: OK...No water in the moat? |
Canie: "Personally, I think they deserve what they got for taunting a female tiger " Me: Seems a little harsh. I'm physically a lot stronger than the neighborhood kids, but I don't think I'll kill them the next time they thumb their noses at me after I tell them to stay off the lawn! Canie: "As for Benazir Bhutto, I firmly believe it was the current regime, not Al Queda, who arranged that tragedy." The youths may have teased the tiger, or not. There is a great deal of conflicting evidence. Musharraf may or may not have been behind Bhutto's assassination. It is not one of the likeliest explanations. Here's a brief excerpt from a Time article: "There is no evidence to suggest that Musharraf or Pakistan's security forces were connected to the attack. On jihadi websites, al-Qaeda claimed the assassination was their work and intelligence officials in both Pakistan and the U.S. agree that Islamic extremists from al-Qaeda or the Taliban were probably responsible for the devastating attack. The latter explanation is the most direct (Bhutto's secularism and popularity - Mike Williams Follow Ups: ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise 21:24:10 - 12/29/2007 (73087) (1) ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 21:37:26 - 12/29/2007 (73089) (1) ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise 21:41:06 - 12/30/2007 (73094) (0) |
|