|
Re: not quite |
John; Of course not, but that's not what I said. If quakes are normally distributed with time you should see fewer on either side of the peak but instead the peak is at zero days and we see a steady decrease. Why is the peak zero rather than 4? Roger Follow Ups: ● peak should always be at zero - John Vidale 14:31:06 - 8/22/2007 (72504) (0) ● peak should always be at zero - John Vidale 14:31:02 - 8/22/2007 (72503) (1) ● Re: peak should always be at zero - Roger Hunter 16:32:41 - 8/22/2007 (72507) (0) ● Re: not quite; also - Roger Hunter 13:37:53 - 8/22/2007 (72502) (1) ● Re: not quite; also - heartland chris 15:26:21 - 8/22/2007 (72506) (0) |
|