|
Re: clustering in solitaire |
This has been an interesting discussion, but... This is also much like the answer to The Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything. It's 42. But what was the question? Without understanding the question, the answer is meaningless. In this case, I don't think we understand what we're looking for. What pattern should we see if tings are normal? What pattern would mean something is significant? Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: clustering in solitaire - Roger Hunter 22:49:39 - 8/20/2007 (72483) (1) ● 42...John V? - heartland chris 06:36:34 - 8/21/2007 (72484) (1) ● no clear pattern - John Vidale 08:08:54 - 8/21/2007 (72485) (1) ● Re: no clear pattern - Roger Hunter 14:15:38 - 8/21/2007 (72487) (2) ● numbers? - John Vidale 18:21:40 - 8/21/2007 (72489) (1) ● Re: numbers? - Roger Hunter 18:55:45 - 8/21/2007 (72490) (1) ● looks like a Poisson process - John Vidale 19:08:38 - 8/21/2007 (72491) (1) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter 19:32:02 - 8/21/2007 (72492) (2) ● there should not be a peak - John Vidale 22:27:25 - 8/21/2007 (72494) (0) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - Roger Hunter 21:11:34 - 8/21/2007 (72493) (2) ● wait a minute - heartland chris 07:01:23 - 8/22/2007 (72497) (1) ● Re: wait a minute - Roger Hunter 09:09:01 - 8/22/2007 (72498) (1) ● I may understand it (sort of) now - heartland chris 15:20:59 - 8/22/2007 (72505) (1) ● exactly (nm) - John Vidale 18:43:01 - 8/22/2007 (72508) (1) ● Re: exactly (nm) - Roger Hunter 20:04:20 - 8/22/2007 (72509) (1) ● check the most anomalous pairs - John Vidale 13:28:03 - 8/23/2007 (72510) (0) ● Re: looks like a Poisson process - heartland chris 06:56:13 - 8/22/2007 (72496) (0) ● clear pattern - heartland chris 14:44:38 - 8/21/2007 (72488) (0) |
|