|
Re: Q. for Canie |
I would think those things can be discussed and linked to, just don't be cut/pasting here.. But do be careful - it's not quite fair when they can't come here and defend themselves.. so do it nicely.. Talking the theory of syzygy is one thing - being derogatory about Jim another.. I think ULF is rather interesting.. And there are some people that really think they can feel quakes about to come.. I think there are 2 - or really one sure one and then another I think is pretty good about 2/3 of the time - they really do very limited postings anywhere.. Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn 05:58:44 - 7/22/2007 (72266) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Skywise 21:47:17 - 7/22/2007 (72275) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn 11:41:06 - 7/23/2007 (72285) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter 12:15:23 - 7/23/2007 (72286) (2) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn 16:32:23 - 7/23/2007 (72289) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter 17:19:29 - 7/23/2007 (72290) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn 18:54:58 - 7/23/2007 (72292) (1) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter 21:49:32 - 7/23/2007 (72293) (0) ● Re: Q. for Canie - Canie 16:32:04 - 7/23/2007 (72288) (0) |
|