Re: Earthquake forecasts online
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 30, 2001 at 21:19:55:

Lowell;

No, I can't say what papers he's quoting. It usually happens when he's trying to dispute one of my criticisms. He comes back with a lengthy post citing you or Fergus Wood or just about anyone who ever said anything favorable about tidal triggering.

But he did post all his primnary windows and assuming his post was accurate, he's only 35% accurate (more or less).

His standard window is -1 to +7 days from new or full moon and he switches between them for reasons only he understands, based on tide height at San Francisco and the number of missing pet ads in various newspapers.

And people pay him to read about it.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - lowell  21:26:03 - 4/30/2001  (7219)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - michael  21:29:15 - 4/30/2001  (7220)  (1)
           ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Petra Challus  23:01:58 - 4/30/2001  (7221)  (2)
              ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - bobshannon.org  04:51:57 - 5/1/2001  (7225)  (0)
              ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Lowell  23:24:34 - 4/30/2001  (7222)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  04:40:37 - 5/1/2001  (7224)  (1)
                    ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - michael  15:43:46 - 5/1/2001  (7236)  (3)
                       ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:21:14 - 5/1/2001  (7241)  (0)
                       ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Roger Hunter  17:18:47 - 5/1/2001  (7239)  (1)
                          ● Sorry, duplicate. Time lag in refresh - Roger Hunter  17:24:06 - 5/1/2001  (7242)  (0)
                       ● Re: Earthquake forecasts online - A Little Clarity - Lowell  16:09:14 - 5/1/2001  (7237)  (1)
                          ● Roger and JOB - michael  10:34:52 - 5/2/2001  (7266)  (1)
                             ● Re: Roger and JOB - Lowell  10:57:48 - 5/2/2001  (7269)  (1)
                                ● Re: Roger and JOB - Roger Hunter  12:33:55 - 5/2/2001  (7282)  (1)
                                   ● Outrage - michael  15:51:04 - 5/2/2001  (7314)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Outrage - Roger Hunter  16:24:32 - 5/2/2001  (7330)  (0)