|
clouds after earthquakes |
Glen...while I don't think a lenticular cloud after Landers would be related, I was watching news reports of Northridge and there was an aftershock and there were very quickly large dust clouds to high levels. I could not figure out how so much dust could get so high so quickly...until much later I heard a talk about the landslides in the Santa Susana Mountains: some large percentage of these hills slid (shallow seated). I assume that landslides are the source of the dust. I don't think Landers caused extensive landslides (different geology, different topography). In the terminology of "Mythbusters", I think it plausible that a dust cloud would affect regular clouds: either makin them as condensation nuclei, or suppressing them because of change in density structure of atmosphere (I assume more dust= more dense so less likely to rise and make clouds. I am a weather buff of sorts and the National Hurricane Center tracks Saharan dust and I recall or mis-recall that they said that dust was suppressing convection. Follow Ups: ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Glen 17:35:18 - 6/9/2007 (71983) (2) ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Cathryn 22:58:46 - 6/9/2007 (71985) (1) ● Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Glen 23:27:29 - 6/9/2007 (71986) (2) ● Re: Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Skywise 18:49:55 - 6/10/2007 (71991) (0) ● Re: Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Cathryn 14:31:43 - 6/10/2007 (71990) (0) ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Roger Hunter 18:45:15 - 6/9/2007 (71984) (2) ● That's OK, but... - Glen 13:12:51 - 6/10/2007 (71989) (0) ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Barbara 08:08:09 - 6/10/2007 (71987) (1) ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Roger Hunter 09:56:09 - 6/10/2007 (71988) (0) |
|