clouds after earthquakes
Posted by heartland chris on June 09, 2007 at 07:39:57:

Glen...while I don't think a lenticular cloud after Landers would be related, I was watching news reports of Northridge and there was an aftershock and there were very quickly large dust clouds to high levels. I could not figure out how so much dust could get so high so quickly...until much later I heard a talk about the landslides in the Santa Susana Mountains: some large percentage of these hills slid (shallow seated). I assume that landslides are the source of the dust. I don't think Landers caused extensive landslides (different geology, different topography). In the terminology of "Mythbusters", I think it plausible that a dust cloud would affect regular clouds: either makin them as condensation nuclei, or suppressing them because of change in density structure of atmosphere (I assume more dust= more dense so less likely to rise and make clouds. I am a weather buff of sorts and the National Hurricane Center tracks Saharan dust and I recall or mis-recall that they said that dust was suppressing convection.
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Glen  17:35:18 - 6/9/2007  (71983)  (2)
        ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Cathryn  22:58:46 - 6/9/2007  (71985)  (1)
           ● Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Glen  23:27:29 - 6/9/2007  (71986)  (2)
              ● Re: Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Skywise  18:49:55 - 6/10/2007  (71991)  (0)
              ● Re: Lenticulars over Anza last Tuesday - Cathryn  14:31:43 - 6/10/2007  (71990)  (0)
        ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Roger Hunter  18:45:15 - 6/9/2007  (71984)  (2)
           ● That's OK, but... - Glen  13:12:51 - 6/10/2007  (71989)  (0)
           ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Barbara  08:08:09 - 6/10/2007  (71987)  (1)
              ● Re: clouds after earthquakes - Roger Hunter  09:56:09 - 6/10/2007  (71988)  (0)