|
|
|
Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!!
|
Posted by lowell on April 28, 2001 at 07:10:18:
Todd, There have been around 4 papers given at AGU and SSA in the past several years regarding triggering effects of the San Francisco earthquake throughout the region. There was a magnitude 6 in Southern California the same day which was probably felt in L.A. Don has a link to the latest paper given last week last week at SSA on this triggering effect. Following is a press release he sent me several days ago: By the way, windows broke a lot easier in the 1800's than today so don't read too much into that.. Following the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake, a large number of = distant aftershocks or triggered earthquakes occurred much farther away = from the fault than previously realized, according to scientists at the = U.S. Geological Survey.=20 Speaking at the annual meeting of the Seismological Society of America = in San Francisco today (4/18/01), Aron Meltzner and David Wald, = researchers at Caltech and the USGS in Pasadena, said aftershocks which = took place within the first two days after the San Francisco mainshock, = rattled areas of southern California, western Arizona, western Nevada = and south-central Oregon. The largest of these events were a magnitude = 6.1 earthquake near the Salton Sea, in California=92s Imperial Valley, = and a magnitude 5.0 earthquake under or near Santa Monica Bay.=20 Traditionally, scientists have thought that earthquakes do not trigger = other earthquakes more than one rupture length away from the fault = rupture. That is, if the part of the fault that slipped in the 1906 = earthquake was 250 miles long, the earthquake would not trigger other = earthquakes more than 250 miles away from that part of the fault. = However, after the 1992 Landers earthquake triggered earthquakes near = Mammoth Lakes, California, Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and in Yellowstone = National Park, the scientific community became more aware of these = =93distant aftershocks.=94 Looking back in time, Meltzner and Wald = wanted to see if the same phenomenon took place after 1906.=20 =93What we found,=94 said Meltzner, =93is that earthquakes started = popping up all over southern California and in Arizona and Oregon that = were well beyond 250 miles from the fault. That doesn=92t include two = earthquakes east of Reno, Nevada that were barely within the 250-mile = radius, and countless others that may have taken place in remote = locations where no one was around to report them. These distant = aftershocks started within an hour of the San Francisco earthquake and = continued for about a day and a half.=94
Follow Ups:
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - Petra Challus 22:37:14 - 4/28/2001 (7200) (1)
● Question for Petra - Todd 20:11:42 - 4/29/2001 (7201) (1)
● Re: Question for Petra - For Todd - Petra Challus 23:20:32 - 4/29/2001 (7202) (0)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - bobshannon.org 07:55:34 - 4/28/2001 (7178) (2)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - Lowell 08:07:55 - 4/28/2001 (7181) (1)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - bobshannon.org 11:23:31 - 4/28/2001 (7191) (1)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - lowell 13:40:26 - 4/28/2001 (7194) (0)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - Roger Hunter 08:04:22 - 4/28/2001 (7180) (1)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - bobshannon.org 11:07:22 - 4/28/2001 (7190) (1)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - Roger Hunter 11:45:41 - 4/28/2001 (7192) (1)
● Re: Historical Bay Area Tremors-A LOT!!! - bobshannon.org 13:45:17 - 4/28/2001 (7195) (0)
|
|
|