Re: Prediction registry
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 25, 2001 at 19:35:30:

Lowell;

Thank you, that's very flattering.

Those on Jim Berkland's board would not agree.

How have you been able to keep the program going over there? The USGS was rather hostile after Branch Chiefs changed, thought it gave credence to those best ignored.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Prediction registry - lowell  19:42:39 - 4/25/2001  (7083)  (2)
        ● Re: Prediction registry - Roger Hunter  20:15:57 - 4/25/2001  (7089)  (1)
           ● Re: Prediction registry - lowell  20:19:55 - 4/25/2001  (7091)  (0)
        ● Re: Prediction registry - Michael  19:59:23 - 4/25/2001  (7085)  (1)
           ● Re: Prediction registry - lowell  20:42:59 - 4/25/2001  (7094)  (1)
              ● Gov - michael  20:56:43 - 4/25/2001  (7096)  (1)
                 ● Re: Gov - lowell  23:03:55 - 4/25/2001  (7098)  (2)
                    ● Wow! - michael  23:27:12 - 4/25/2001  (7100)  (1)
                       ● Re: Wow! - lowell  00:19:03 - 4/26/2001  (7102)  (1)
                          ● Re: Wow! - Canie  08:48:00 - 4/26/2001  (7121)  (0)
                    ● Re: Gov - lowell  23:19:31 - 4/25/2001  (7099)  (2)
                       ● Re: Gov - Roger Hunter  05:18:55 - 4/26/2001  (7108)  (0)
                       ● Re: Gov - michael  23:31:24 - 4/25/2001  (7101)  (1)
                          ● Re: Gov - lowell  00:22:01 - 4/26/2001  (7103)  (3)
                             ● Re: Gov - michael  08:25:12 - 4/26/2001  (7114)  (0)
                             ● Re: Gov - Roger Hunter  07:19:22 - 4/26/2001  (7110)  (1)
                                ● Exactly! NT - michael  08:26:41 - 4/26/2001  (7116)  (0)
                             ● Re: Gov - Don in Hollister  00:52:22 - 4/26/2001  (7104)  (0)