|
Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth |
Unless you are dumber then I think you are, then you know exactly what was meant. You don't see me saying anything about the Vegas 3.4 do you. Thats between those points as well using your logic. Follow Ups: ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 16:59:40 - 4/24/2001 (7007) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 22:20:52 - 4/24/2001 (7012) (1) ● Boasting - michael 22:38:46 - 4/24/2001 (7013) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter 15:24:52 - 4/24/2001 (7006) (2) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 09:48:59 - 4/25/2001 (7026) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 17:01:59 - 4/24/2001 (7008) (2) ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis 09:50:08 - 4/25/2001 (7028) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter 17:31:42 - 4/24/2001 (7009) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 22:44:46 - 4/24/2001 (7016) (0) |
|