|
Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth |
Hey; are you two at it again? Sheesh! I turn my back for a minute and look what happens.... Dennis, why are you so touchy? Michael asked a perfectly correct question; exactly what area are you talking about? You gave two place names only. That's a line. Unless you really mean the expected quake will fall on that line, it's a vague prediction. You MUST give an area or a range or something. For example "20 km either side of a line between A and B" would work although I don't know how we could evaluate it. We can only search rectangles and circles with the NEIC database. Roger
Follow Ups: ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Dennis 09:48:59 - 4/25/2001 (7026) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 17:01:59 - 4/24/2001 (7008) (2) ● butt head posts again (nt) - Dennis 09:50:08 - 4/25/2001 (7028) (0) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - Roger Hunter 17:31:42 - 4/24/2001 (7009) (1) ● Re: Ridgecrest and mammoth - michael 22:44:46 - 4/24/2001 (7016) (0) |
|