|
Another! question for Den!? |
Dennis; Now notice this Q had no parameters...but lets talk shop here one to one... what should I do with a Q so close to me that better fits my parameters (*as put in another days section)? I have had folks say..."You said the 'other' quake was a hit....you cannot say both are hits"...but I say that I have the right as the predictor-- to chose what is best...and they say...well wait till the window is closed...yet many claim hits for me when and beforehand... so can we come up with some ideas on this? Bob Follow Ups: ● Re: Another! question for Den!? - Don in Hollister 12:03:00 - 4/22/2001 (6929) (1) ● Re: Another! question for Den!? - Dennis 12:22:27 - 4/22/2001 (6931) (1) ● Re: Another! question for Den!? - Roger Hunter 12:35:52 - 4/22/2001 (6933) (1) ● modifying predictions - Dennis 10:37:00 - 4/23/2001 (6941) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Hunter 18:50:54 - 4/23/2001 (6947) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Dennis 20:21:28 - 4/23/2001 (6951) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Musson 03:08:28 - 4/24/2001 (6958) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Dennis 08:51:49 - 4/24/2001 (6964) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Hunter 09:58:56 - 4/24/2001 (6968) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Dennis 10:27:47 - 4/24/2001 (6970) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Hunter 11:21:26 - 4/24/2001 (6972) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Dennis 12:35:27 - 4/24/2001 (6976) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Hunter 15:16:07 - 4/24/2001 (7005) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Musson 08:13:46 - 4/25/2001 (7024) (1) ● Re: modifying predictions - Roger Hunter 15:37:09 - 4/25/2001 (7050) (0) ● Re: Another! question for Den!? - Roger Hunter 18:17:27 - 4/21/2001 (6915) (0) ● Re: Another! question for Den!? - Dennis 17:21:54 - 4/21/2001 (6913) (1) ● Danke - bobshannon.org 05:27:44 - 4/22/2001 (6923) (0) |
|