|
Re: San Andreas at Parkfield |
They are going to make Parkfield go sooner or later. I really cannot see USGS or others continuing dollars poured into the ancient prediction. From the LA Times in 1998 came this: Despite the failure of the quake to happen during the period expected, scientists remain interested in the sparsely populated Parkfield area, roughly midway between Los Angeles and San Francisco, because it was the scene of 6 magnitude quakes at fairly regular intervals over a 109-year period between the mid-19th and mid-20th centuries. There were such jolts in 1857, 1881, 1901, 1922, 1934 and 1966. Based on the average 22-year interval, many scientists felt very confident that a similar quake would occur in the area within four years, either way, of 1988, and that was the genesis of the Parkfield prediction experiment."
Follow Ups: ● Re: San Andreas at Parkfield - Petra Challus 11:52:31 - 4/8/2001 (6619) (3) ● Re: San Andreas at Parkfield - Todd 18:47:35 - 4/8/2001 (6622) (2) ● Re: San Andreas at Parkfield - Dennis 10:17:50 - 4/9/2001 (6627) (0) ● ULF - bobshannon.org 04:27:27 - 4/9/2001 (6625) (1) ● Re: ULF - Canie 17:58:26 - 4/9/2001 (6633) (0) ● Re: San Andreas at Parkfield - Todd 18:47:16 - 4/8/2001 (6621) (0) ● Duh - bobshannon.org 14:58:58 - 4/8/2001 (6620) (2) ● Re: Duh - Canie 17:56:20 - 4/9/2001 (6632) (0) ● Re: Duh - Just Imagine - Petra Challus 03:17:21 - 4/9/2001 (6623) (1) ● Cascadia - bobshannon.org 04:20:01 - 4/9/2001 (6624) (0) |
|