Solar eclipse induced seismic activities...
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on March 19, 2007 at 00:42:12:

Hi all!
Today's Solar eclipse activity may induce 6.5 to 8M quake activity as detailed hereunder. Though the probablity is high over QINGHI CHINA and Solomon Island area, considering the 80% eclipse activity over China, possibility over China is HIGH, I suspect.

DETAILS:
Suspect around 6.5 to 8M over one of the following location and the other will receive lesser magnitude over

QINGHAI, CHINA (34.6N 90.6E)
SOLOMON ISL.-NEW BRITAIN RGN.(5.23S 153.10E)
SOUTHEASTERN SIBERIA (57.5N 120.6E) - VANUATU ISLANDS ( 15.35 S 167.64 E)

around 4 to 5.5+M over

SIKKIM, INDIA (27.9N 88.0E)- LUZON, PHILIPPINE (15.1N 120.1E)
TALAUD ISLANDS (4.8N 126.3E) - ROMANIA (45.70N 26.74E)
NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU ( 36.4N 140.9E)

around 2 to 4M over

PUNJAB, INDIA (31.50N 74.80E)

may occur within next 48 to 280 hours from 04.30 UTC on 18th March '07.

Let us watch.

Shan

Follow Ups:
     ● Historic quake on the way.....? - R.Shanmugasundaram  09:08:05 - 3/20/2007  (63686)  (2)
        ● Results - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:39:33 - 3/24/2007  (63811)  (0)
        ● Results - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:39:33 - 3/24/2007  (63810)  (1)
           ● 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  18:12:31 - 4/1/2007  (64000)  (1)
              ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - heartland chris  06:49:37 - 4/2/2007  (65027)  (2)
                 ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:10:55 - 4/2/2007  (65050)  (1)
                    ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  23:09:25 - 4/2/2007  (65061)  (1)
                       ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  10:36:16 - 4/3/2007  (65094)  (1)
                          ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  15:14:52 - 4/3/2007  (65114)  (1)
                             ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  20:31:11 - 4/3/2007  (65132)  (1)
                                ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  21:58:04 - 4/3/2007  (65137)  (0)
                 ● I have. He isn't. They don't. - Roger Hunter  08:20:06 - 4/2/2007  (65028)  (1)
                    ● Re: I have. He isn't. They don't. - heartland chris  12:27:58 - 4/2/2007  (65035)  (0)