|
Windows |
Please don't expect any large difference. It's an exercise in accuracy and consistancy and details. Yes, It will be a lot of windows. It might be better to do in in C or C++ considering the size of the integers. I have no idea how long it would take to run, but of course that will depend on the window size of the prediction, and the size of that catalog (timewise) we are comparing it to. There should be no partial windows anywhere, beginning or end. Let me give you an example. Lets say we have a catalog that is 60 seconds long. Lets say the prediction is for 5 seconds. The sample windows would look like: Window 1 0-5 seconds and so on Window last-2 53-58 seconds We should have a total of 56 windows at the end. No partial windows. No end of catalog to be tossed out. I would only expect to calculate this for each new hit, not each new prediction. I think misses are deemed to be a big zero in the value department. Michael
Follow Ups: ● Re: Windows - Roger Hunter 19:42:47 - 3/21/2001 (6268) (0) ● Look at it this way .... - michael 16:54:57 - 3/21/2001 (6263) (2) ● Re: Look at it this way .... - Roger Hunter 19:25:23 - 3/21/2001 (6267) (1) ● We've come to drawing? Yikes! ;) - michael 21:27:55 - 3/21/2001 (6269) (1) ● Re: We've come to drawing? Yikes! ;) - Roger Hunter 06:33:47 - 3/22/2001 (6274) (0) ● Re: Look at it this way .... - Roger Hunter 18:55:35 - 3/21/2001 (6266) (0) |
|