|
Re: Anecdotes Do Not Make A Science |
CAL, THERE'S NO NEED TO YELL!!!! Yet again, when push comes to shove and the perpetrators of pseudoscience are asked the hard questions, to show their evidence, to back up their claims, they get all get offended and defensive, and start reacting emotionally. I've noticed the responses are sometimes more vehement when it's their get rich quick scheme. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: Anecdotes Do Not Make A Science - Cal 16:36:14 - 7/21/2006 (39451) (1) ● Re: Anecdotes Do Not Make A Science - Skywise 16:53:13 - 7/21/2006 (39452) (1) ● Re: Anecdotes Do Not Make A Science - Cal 17:04:31 - 7/21/2006 (39453) (1) ● Re: Anecdotes Do Not Make A Science - Skywise 17:51:45 - 7/21/2006 (39455) (3) ● Re: Skywise and Chickens - cal 18:24:17 - 7/21/2006 (39459) (0) ● Re: To Anti-Chicken Man - cal 18:23:43 - 7/21/2006 (39458) (0) ● Re: To Anti-Chicken Man - cal 18:23:01 - 7/21/2006 (39456) (1) ● ad hominem - Skywise 18:46:05 - 7/21/2006 (39461) (2) ● What science are you involved in? - Glen 21:15:34 - 7/21/2006 (39465) (1) ● Re: What science are you involved in? - Skywise 00:42:33 - 7/22/2006 (39473) (1) ● Sound well rounded - Glen 12:05:08 - 7/22/2006 (39484) (0) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal 20:25:13 - 7/21/2006 (39463) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 00:30:37 - 7/22/2006 (39472) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Callie 10:26:32 - 7/22/2006 (39482) (2) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 15:56:01 - 7/22/2006 (39486) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal 17:22:43 - 7/22/2006 (39487) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 20:25:37 - 7/22/2006 (39490) (0) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Roger Hunter 12:02:52 - 7/22/2006 (39483) (0) |
|