|
Re: To Anti-Chicken Man |
Is everything you write completely researched from scratch on your own? No, you reference the work of others. You're book on JOB does that. Should I complain about you're constant references in that book to the work of others and claim that "you seem to lack originality"? "And, I can't resist this one. In disaster films ever notice how the underdog or the scientist who is a maverick always is right? Brian, often fiction mirrors real life." And fiction is often just that, fiction. You think a work of fiction is a good reference to base an argument on? It's a story. It's not real life. It's FANTASY.
Follow Ups: ● ad hominem - Skywise 18:46:05 - 7/21/2006 (39461) (2) ● What science are you involved in? - Glen 21:15:34 - 7/21/2006 (39465) (1) ● Re: What science are you involved in? - Skywise 00:42:33 - 7/22/2006 (39473) (1) ● Sound well rounded - Glen 12:05:08 - 7/22/2006 (39484) (0) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal 20:25:13 - 7/21/2006 (39463) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 00:30:37 - 7/22/2006 (39472) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Callie 10:26:32 - 7/22/2006 (39482) (2) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 15:56:01 - 7/22/2006 (39486) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal 17:22:43 - 7/22/2006 (39487) (1) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise 20:25:37 - 7/22/2006 (39490) (0) ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Roger Hunter 12:02:52 - 7/22/2006 (39483) (0) |
|