|
Re: Let's get back to earthquakes |
(I thot I had you...heh heh heh) OK, then you are saying that if you predict an event that you have to include the failures in your overall prediction score? Jim Berkland does include his misses, doesn't he? Follow Ups: ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter 14:51:27 - 6/18/2006 (38473) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - marc / berkeley 11:36:33 - 6/19/2006 (38520) (1) ● Re: Let's get back to earthquakes - Roger Hunter 12:31:50 - 6/19/2006 (38524) (0) |
|