Shan, see if I understand correctly
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 12, 2006 at 07:10:42:

if you get a precursor and predict a quake, it's a new quake even if it follows a larger quake

But if you don't predict it, it's an aftershock.

LOL!

Heads, you will. Tails, I lose.

Roger

PS: Percentage of hits is meaningless. Skywise gets 92% correct.
Your results are pure chance.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Shan, see if I understand correctly - Cathryn  14:09:14 - 6/12/2006  (38230)  (1)
        ● Re: Shan, see if I understand correctly - Roger Hunter  16:09:08 - 6/12/2006  (38235)  (1)
           ● Re: Shan, see if I understand correctly - Cathryn  16:22:37 - 6/12/2006  (38236)  (1)
              ● Give the lady a cigar! - Roger Hunter  21:42:29 - 6/12/2006  (38244)  (1)
                 ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Cathryn  22:26:57 - 6/12/2006  (38245)  (2)
                    ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Roger Hunter  00:17:18 - 6/13/2006  (38251)  (2)
                       ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Glen  00:44:46 - 6/13/2006  (38254)  (1)
                          ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Roger Hunter  07:02:11 - 6/13/2006  (38261)  (0)
                       ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Roger Hunter  00:23:19 - 6/13/2006  (38252)  (1)
                          ● Ah. (NT) - Cathryn  00:43:54 - 6/13/2006  (38253)  (0)
                    ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Glen  00:07:06 - 6/13/2006  (38249)  (1)
                       ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Cathryn  00:53:42 - 6/13/2006  (38256)  (1)
                          ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Glen  01:12:06 - 6/13/2006  (38257)  (1)
                             ● Re: Give the lady a cigar! - Cathryn  13:27:10 - 6/13/2006  (38275)  (0)
     ● I understand correctly - R.Shanmugasundaram  09:27:41 - 6/12/2006  (38226)  (0)