not exactly what I meant
Posted by John Vidale on June 07, 2006 at 18:58:00:

Just send this to Karen and Emily, the paper's authors.

"wow, my quote was oversimplified and distorted a bit:

"John Vidale, a University of California, Los Angeles geophysicist who had no role in the study, said it's plausible ground-shaking can influence faraway aftershocks. But Vidale said he's not convinced this occurs near the ruptured fault."

I thought I said inevitable rather than plausible, and "not convinced it is the dominant process very near" rather than "not convinced this occurs near"."


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Cathryn  19:08:27 - 6/7/2006  (37995)  (1)
        ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Roger Hunter  20:55:11 - 6/7/2006  (38002)  (1)
           ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Cathryn  21:06:10 - 6/7/2006  (38004)  (1)
              ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Roger Hunter  22:01:53 - 6/7/2006  (38011)  (1)
                 ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Cathryn  22:07:47 - 6/7/2006  (38015)  (1)
                    ● Re: not exactly what I meant - Roger Hunter  22:20:20 - 6/7/2006  (38022)  (1)
                       ● Ah. (NT) - Cathryn  23:54:32 - 6/7/2006  (38027)  (1)
                          ● Re: Ah. (NT) - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:08:13 - 6/8/2006  (38048)  (2)
                             ● Re: Ah. (NT) - Cathryn  12:52:05 - 6/8/2006  (38070)  (0)
                             ● Re: Ah. (NT) - Canie  09:01:33 - 6/8/2006  (38054)  (0)