|
Re: Don, Chris, all |
Hi Roger. It might help if you explained the difference between a prediction to be made and one that has already been made. It would help to know the method being used to predict the quake before the prediction is made. This is done in order to see if the quake has a chance to occur. In this instance the method is being evaluated and not the prediction. For a prediction that has already been made the method doesn’t need to be known as only the prediction is being evaluated. Did the quake occur where it was said and did it occur when it was said it was going to occur and how close to the predicted magnitude was it. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● p.s....John V. - chris in suburbia 16:16:53 - 3/9/2006 (34663) (2) ● Re: p.s....John V. - Roger Hunter 20:21:13 - 3/9/2006 (34668) (0) ● hectic around here - John Vidale 19:54:30 - 3/9/2006 (34665) (1) ● Re: hectic around here - Don in Hollister 20:19:10 - 3/9/2006 (34667) (1) ● must have missed your method description - John Vidale 20:24:08 - 3/9/2006 (34669) (1) ● Re: must have missed your method description - Don in Hollister 20:40:17 - 3/9/2006 (34673) (1) ● not watching carefully - John Vidale 06:19:26 - 3/10/2006 (34676) (1) ● Re: not watching carefully - Don in Hollister 12:36:29 - 3/10/2006 (34681) (1) ● august - John Vidale 12:40:09 - 3/10/2006 (34682) (1) ● Re: august - Jim W. 21:07:22 - 3/10/2006 (34690) (1) ● TBD - John Vidale 00:01:57 - 3/11/2006 (34692) (0) ● Re: Don, Chris, all - chris in suburbia 16:13:32 - 3/9/2006 (34662) (1) ● Re: Don, Chris, all - Roger Hunter 20:37:34 - 3/9/2006 (34672) (1) ● Re: Don, Chris, all - Steve S/ SF 00:19:47 - 3/10/2006 (34675) (1) ● Re: Don, Chris, all - Roger Hunter 06:58:04 - 3/10/2006 (34677) (0) |
|