Re: Update
Posted by Roger Musson on August 06, 2000 at 10:10:10:

Maybe, but by analogy with seismic recording, a distant signal should not only be shorter/more intermittent but also lower amplitude. If you describe a very short high-amplitude signal my reaction is "spike". It would be something marvellous if your instrument NEVER picked up something extraneous. Seismometers do so frequently. Why should yours be totally immune to all other sources of signal? Don't believe it.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Update - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  10:28:23 - 8/6/2000  (3442)  (1)
        ● Geomagnetism - Roger Musson  03:30:51 - 8/7/2000  (3445)  (1)
           ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  09:28:03 - 8/7/2000  (3446)  (1)
              ● Re: Geomagnetism - Roger Musson  04:10:44 - 8/8/2000  (3450)  (1)
                 ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  10:30:33 - 8/8/2000  (3453)  (2)
                    ● Re: Geomagnetism - Roger Musson  02:59:55 - 8/9/2000  (3455)  (1)
                       ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  10:30:51 - 8/9/2000  (3458)  (0)
                    ● Re: Geomagnetism - Petra Challus  22:32:09 - 8/8/2000  (3454)  (1)
                       ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  10:20:52 - 8/9/2000  (3457)  (1)
                          ● Re: Geomagnetism - Petra Challus  17:26:24 - 8/9/2000  (3459)  (0)