|
Re: Update |
Maybe, but by analogy with seismic recording, a distant signal should not only be shorter/more intermittent but also lower amplitude. If you describe a very short high-amplitude signal my reaction is "spike". It would be something marvellous if your instrument NEVER picked up something extraneous. Seismometers do so frequently. Why should yours be totally immune to all other sources of signal? Don't believe it. Follow Ups: ● Re: Update - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 10:28:23 - 8/6/2000 (3442) (1) ● Geomagnetism - Roger Musson 03:30:51 - 8/7/2000 (3445) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 09:28:03 - 8/7/2000 (3446) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Roger Musson 04:10:44 - 8/8/2000 (3450) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:30:33 - 8/8/2000 (3453) (2) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Roger Musson 02:59:55 - 8/9/2000 (3455) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:30:51 - 8/9/2000 (3458) (0) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Petra Challus 22:32:09 - 8/8/2000 (3454) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita 10:20:52 - 8/9/2000 (3457) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetism - Petra Challus 17:26:24 - 8/9/2000 (3459) (0) |
|