statistics not her strong point
Posted by John Vidale on February 17, 2006 at 08:36:17:

My argument that tides can have an effect only when they are strongest went entirely over her head. She thinks either they do or they do not effect, so I'm trying to have it both ways if some remote corners of Alaska or the SW Pacific have a few triggered earthquakes, but the West Coast does not.

Also, the difference between the twice a day rise and fall of the sea and the biweekly modulation of the amplitude of the tides got short shrift. My work shows weak correlations only with the former, but Berkland's windows are entirely built on the latter.

Still, an enjoyable read.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Cal  11:00:07 - 2/18/2006  (33868)  (2)
        ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Skywise  18:05:18 - 2/18/2006  (33871)  (1)
           ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Cal  20:38:42 - 2/18/2006  (33875)  (1)
              ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Skywise  22:10:43 - 2/18/2006  (33882)  (1)
                 ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Cal  23:35:22 - 2/18/2006  (33889)  (1)
                    ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Skywise  13:54:10 - 2/19/2006  (33910)  (2)
                       ● Re: statistics not her strong point - Cal  17:25:57 - 2/19/2006  (33919)  (0)
                       ● Re: Brian's weak point - Cal  15:45:07 - 2/19/2006  (33916)  (1)
                          ● Re: Brian's weak point - Skywise  20:20:42 - 2/19/2006  (33924)  (1)
                             ● Re: Brian's weak point - Cal  11:22:04 - 2/20/2006  (33942)  (1)
                                ● Re: Brian's weak point - Skywise  15:06:02 - 2/20/2006  (33979)  (0)
        ● that's not my objection - John Vidale  12:57:44 - 2/18/2006  (33870)  (0)