|
Re: Use of loaded dice and loaded words |
Hello Roger, Fraud, cheating, same connotation. What I am hearing here is that all predictions are scientifically valid, and if that is the case, then there can be no fraud at all. Even if somebody takes money for a prediction, if it is scientifically valid for somebody to use whatever parameter, then how can it be fraud or a cheat? Has seismology set validity for prediction parameters? No. I would like to hear from Roger, please. Also I would like to wish you and your family a wonderful Thanksgiving Holiday, Roger. glen
Follow Ups: ● Re: Use of loaded dice and loaded words - Roger Hunter 14:15:08 - 11/23/2005 (30955) (1) ● Re: Use of loaded dice and loaded words - glen 14:23:11 - 11/23/2005 (30956) (1) ● Re: Use of loaded dice and loaded words - Don in Hollister 14:26:21 - 11/23/2005 (30957) (1) ● Negatory, Don - glen 15:02:11 - 11/23/2005 (30958) (1) ● Re: Negatory, Don - Roger Hunter 15:11:33 - 11/23/2005 (30959) (1) ● Re: Negatory, Don - glen 15:15:40 - 11/23/2005 (30960) (1) ● Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Ara 19:34:22 - 11/23/2005 (30968) (3) ● Re: Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - glen 00:27:33 - 11/24/2005 (30976) (1) ● Don IS using Lowell Whiteside's method, - Ara 06:32:40 - 11/24/2005 (30977) (0) ● my impression - John Vidale 22:56:54 - 11/23/2005 (30974) (0) ● Re: Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Don in Hollister 20:17:35 - 11/23/2005 (30969) (1) ● So, then is one of Lowell Whiteside's Methods Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Ara 06:42:56 - 11/24/2005 (30978) (0) |
|