Negatory, Don
Posted by glen on November 23, 2005 at 15:02:11:

Hello Don,

Unless somebody else made the prediction, and you were copy catting the prediction knowing they were really good at it. If you are using the methodology
to get hits without help, that is neither fraud nor cheating. Also your predictions do not follow large initiator events, so with Rogers definition your predictions are neither fraud nor cheating, and scientifically valid.

glen


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Negatory, Don - Roger Hunter  15:11:33 - 11/23/2005  (30959)  (1)
        ● Re: Negatory, Don - glen  15:15:40 - 11/23/2005  (30960)  (1)
           ● Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Ara  19:34:22 - 11/23/2005  (30968)  (3)
              ● Re: Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - glen  00:27:33 - 11/24/2005  (30976)  (1)
                 ● Don IS using Lowell Whiteside's method,  - Ara  06:32:40 - 11/24/2005  (30977)  (0)
              ● my impression - John Vidale  22:56:54 - 11/23/2005  (30974)  (0)
              ● Re: Lowell Whiteside's Method Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Don in Hollister  20:17:35 - 11/23/2005  (30969)  (1)
                 ● So, then is one of Lowell Whiteside's Methods Endorsed by Roger Hunter? - Ara  06:42:56 - 11/24/2005  (30978)  (0)