Reply to Ara and Don
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on September 08, 2005 at 07:10:16:

Ara,

Yes.. this prediction also based on two days sunshine but closer than the previous
one (Honshu) which had longer sunshine days. Hence I am confident about the result.

Just I want to insist on my statement that every quake had its own precursor and my
intension is not beyond that level.

If you go through other agencies you can find many mismatches in reporting. Hence
I used to give my report by referring more than one in my website carefully noting
that the result already been checked manually by a seismologist.

>How do you know that lack of sunlight interfered with your location parameter,
rather than your magnitude parameter? (or even time parameter?)

I analysis the formation of the dip viz. angle, shift, time, length etc., compared
with other formation and come to the final conclusion.

As I said, if my predictions induced concrete truth in my method and any Govt. /
Institution come forward to support and invites me openly to develop the same in
order to get more accuracy, than I will disclose the same. So wait until Bright.

I have much respect to Don's advice and also willing to work in that direction
when the above fact comes true.


Shan


Follow Ups:
     ● Shan, you are working against yourself - Roger Hunter  08:10:14 - 9/8/2005  (28059)  (1)
        ● 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  02:27:56 - 9/9/2005  (28093)  (1)
           ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  06:21:44 - 9/9/2005  (28097)  (1)
              ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  09:27:43 - 9/9/2005  (28101)  (1)
                 ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  12:50:05 - 9/9/2005  (28134)  (1)
                    ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  09:39:42 - 9/10/2005  (28155)  (1)
                       ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  11:33:07 - 9/10/2005  (28161)  (1)
                          ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  00:58:35 - 9/11/2005  (28163)  (1)
                             ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - Roger Hunter  08:15:12 - 9/11/2005  (28166)  (1)
                                ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain  - R.Shanmugasundaram  04:23:20 - 9/12/2005  (28185)  (0)