|
Reply to Ara and Don |
Ara, Yes.. this prediction also based on two days sunshine but closer than the previous Just I want to insist on my statement that every quake had its own precursor and my If you go through other agencies you can find many mismatches in reporting. Hence I analysis the formation of the dip viz. angle, shift, time, length etc., compared As I said, if my predictions induced concrete truth in my method and any Govt. / I have much respect to Don's advice and also willing to work in that direction
Follow Ups: ● Shan, you are working against yourself - Roger Hunter 08:10:14 - 9/8/2005 (28059) (1) ● 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 02:27:56 - 9/9/2005 (28093) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 06:21:44 - 9/9/2005 (28097) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 09:27:43 - 9/9/2005 (28101) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 12:50:05 - 9/9/2005 (28134) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 09:39:42 - 9/10/2005 (28155) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 11:33:07 - 9/10/2005 (28161) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 00:58:35 - 9/11/2005 (28163) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 08:15:12 - 9/11/2005 (28166) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 04:23:20 - 9/12/2005 (28185) (0) |
|