|
Re: 7.3 at New Britain |
Shan; > Evaluation in a biased way (Eg. my Honshu / Andaman predictions),no use in arguing with a mathametician who is expert in using predetermined equations rather than a scientist. I take exception to your charge of bias. The Honshu prediction was wrong by your own definition and I did not examine the Andaman case. > Today 7.3M New Britain quake is also a hit according to my method of prediction (refer my website) but every one willing to supress it. I checked your website and found no prediction for that area. Please post it here. > But I am not stopped my way of predicition though it had initial problem and will be set right soon. No one is asking you to stop. I'm just keeping score. Roger
Follow Ups: ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 09:27:43 - 9/9/2005 (28101) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 12:50:05 - 9/9/2005 (28134) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 09:39:42 - 9/10/2005 (28155) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 11:33:07 - 9/10/2005 (28161) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 00:58:35 - 9/11/2005 (28163) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - Roger Hunter 08:15:12 - 9/11/2005 (28166) (1) ● Re: 7.3 at New Britain - R.Shanmugasundaram 04:23:20 - 9/12/2005 (28185) (0) |
|