Re: No NoCal prediction outstanding
Posted by Cathryn on September 03, 2004 at 22:46:23:

Cool link, John. They even quoted you a couple of times.

I disagree with you, though, on one point. If K-B misses by just five days (given the long length he gave this prediction), yes, that is technically a miss (Oh, you scientists), but I'd give it a hit in my book.

I don't think earthquake prediction is that precise at this juncture.

I'll be hoping that way out in the Mojave, his 6.4 will strike by Sunday, injuring no one and bringing earthquake prediction into the new century.

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● a miss is a miss - John Vidale  23:50:05 - 9/3/2004  (22717)  (1)
        ● Re: a miss is a miss - Cathryn  18:01:50 - 9/4/2004  (22720)  (1)
           ● we're working a bit on that - John Vidale  18:28:00 - 9/4/2004  (22723)  (2)
              ● The moon/tidal theory - Cathryn  20:30:17 - 9/4/2004  (22726)  (0)
              ● But my question ... - Cathryn  20:24:15 - 9/4/2004  (22725)  (2)
                 ● Re: But my question ... - Roger Hunter  21:48:11 - 9/4/2004  (22729)  (1)
                    ● Re: But my question ... - Cathryn  16:29:13 - 9/5/2004  (22740)  (1)
                       ● P.S. to Roger - Cathryn  17:14:54 - 9/5/2004  (22745)  (1)
                          ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Roger Hunter  21:11:45 - 9/5/2004  (22751)  (1)
                             ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Cathryn  14:51:52 - 9/6/2004  (22765)  (0)
                 ● I've no idea - John Vidale  21:03:49 - 9/4/2004  (22727)  (3)
                    ● JOB - Cathryn  16:33:02 - 9/5/2004  (22741)  (1)
                       ● Re: JOB - Cathryn  16:35:46 - 9/5/2004  (22742)  (0)
                    ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn  16:23:25 - 9/5/2004  (22738)  (0)
                    ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn  16:22:58 - 9/5/2004  (22736)  (1)
                       ● More on the books - Cathryn  16:25:28 - 9/5/2004  (22739)  (0)