|
Re: No NoCal prediction outstanding |
Cool link, John. They even quoted you a couple of times. I disagree with you, though, on one point. If K-B misses by just five days (given the long length he gave this prediction), yes, that is technically a miss (Oh, you scientists), but I'd give it a hit in my book. I don't think earthquake prediction is that precise at this juncture. I'll be hoping that way out in the Mojave, his 6.4 will strike by Sunday, injuring no one and bringing earthquake prediction into the new century. Cathryn Follow Ups: ● a miss is a miss - John Vidale 23:50:05 - 9/3/2004 (22717) (1) ● Re: a miss is a miss - Cathryn 18:01:50 - 9/4/2004 (22720) (1) ● we're working a bit on that - John Vidale 18:28:00 - 9/4/2004 (22723) (2) ● The moon/tidal theory - Cathryn 20:30:17 - 9/4/2004 (22726) (0) ● But my question ... - Cathryn 20:24:15 - 9/4/2004 (22725) (2) ● Re: But my question ... - Roger Hunter 21:48:11 - 9/4/2004 (22729) (1) ● Re: But my question ... - Cathryn 16:29:13 - 9/5/2004 (22740) (1) ● P.S. to Roger - Cathryn 17:14:54 - 9/5/2004 (22745) (1) ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Roger Hunter 21:11:45 - 9/5/2004 (22751) (1) ● Re: P.S. to Roger - Cathryn 14:51:52 - 9/6/2004 (22765) (0) ● I've no idea - John Vidale 21:03:49 - 9/4/2004 (22727) (3) ● JOB - Cathryn 16:33:02 - 9/5/2004 (22741) (1) ● Re: JOB - Cathryn 16:35:46 - 9/5/2004 (22742) (0) ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn 16:23:25 - 9/5/2004 (22738) (0) ● Re: I've no idea - Cathryn 16:22:58 - 9/5/2004 (22736) (1) ● More on the books - Cathryn 16:25:28 - 9/5/2004 (22739) (0) |
|