|
Your choice |
I have posted that Web address to so many notes here I thought that everyone probably had it memorized by now: http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/90-05.html I work on projects which are designed to save lives. And I generally learn only what is absolutely necessary about the technology. When the project is a success or it fails completely I then just move on to the next one. The answers that I gave you to your tide questions were the best that I could come up with considering I am not a tide expert.My ETDPROG.pl program is I am fairly certain, the most advanced forecasting program for destructive earthquakes which is in existence anywhere on Earth. It appears to represent about the only hope that most of the people on the planet have of receiving a warning before a destructive earthquake occurs near them. And if you feel that that is not much of a hope at the moment then I am afraid that I have to agree. But at least some hope is better than none. And I am finding from preliminary evaluations of my Data.html data that the program is actually producing better results than I thought it would. I am now at the point where I believe I know how to get it to produce what I feel would be very clear, impressive, and important results. But I don’t have time to do the computer programming. If you are not interested in learning how it works and how to interpret the data that it produces then that means that you are missing the chance to work with the most advanced and important data you will ever see. And you should remember that earthquakes do not occur where I live. So your decision on that would not make any difference to me. However, I believe that you yourself do live in earthquake land. And so when you make a decision not to work with something that might save your own life then you are also making that decision for everyone that you know, friends, family members, relatives, colleagues, neighbors etc. Remember that deadly earthquakes are a one-way street. Once you lose a friend etc. to one then that person will not be returning unless you happen to believe in reincarnation. I understand that you and your colleagues are expecting an earthquake in the California area at some point in time. I probably have the only data which can tell you when it is likely to occur. Is it going to do you much good to predict one for that area and then have it occur unexpectedly? Your choice. Follow Ups: ● Rise to your own challenge - Cathryn 14:25:28 - 8/9/2004 (22398) (0) ● very colorful, but Roger? - John Vidale 07:12:31 - 8/7/2004 (22340) (2) ● Comments - EQF 16:03:18 - 8/7/2004 (22350) (2) ● a chance for you to show a little knowledge - John Vidale 16:47:37 - 8/7/2004 (22356) (1) ● Re: a chance for you to show a little knowledge - EQF 19:01:19 - 8/7/2004 (22361) (1) ● I am looking for ideas that work. - John Vidale 20:46:20 - 8/7/2004 (22367) (0) ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 16:20:42 - 8/7/2004 (22353) (1) ● Earthquakes and the sun - Earth - moon angle - EQF 16:44:52 - 8/7/2004 (22355) (1) ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 17:46:38 - 8/7/2004 (22358) (0) ● Test of mag 8+ quakes - Roger Hunter 07:56:57 - 8/7/2004 (22344) (1) ● thanks (nm) - John Vidale 08:26:11 - 8/7/2004 (22345) (0) |
|