Hi Chris,

I've learned a lot from you and other scientists. For one thing, it pays not to say anything that a good majority of folks won't agree with. That way you can't be labeled a kook or a quack.

It also teaches you to form groups behind the scenes who work well together and have a common goal in mind. Its supportive, yet educational as you learn from each other.

Earthquake prediction predominantly works from and after event type of situation, whereas sensitives work with a before event situation. Someone asks you to prove ahead of time you're right, but yet, those of science only need to prove something is real after it happens. Kind of quirky.

For the most part I've learned to say as little as possible about ear tones, just like I do about psychic phenomena. A good segment of our society fears the future. I don't, but I'll spare them the commentary. I always like to use one simple universal theory in regard to believing ask ask why 80% of the people around the world believe in someone they cannot see, nor have any proof of his existence, yep it's God. So if some of us believe we can hear earthquakes in advance, have precognition, or other unusual experiences, why are we labeled kooks and nuts? It makes me wonder, but I don't find it daunting in the least.

Petra