>I've learned a lot from you and other scientists. For one thing, it pays not to say anything that a good majority of folks won't agree
with. That way you can't be labeled a kook or a quack.

Or a Bozo.

> For the most part I've learned to say as little as possible about ear tones, just like I do about psychic phenomena. A good segment ofour society fears the future. I don't, but I'll spare them the commentary.

Oh, do go on about it. I feel as you do.

> I always like to use one simple universal theory in regard to
believing ask ask why 80% of the people around the world believe in someone they cannot see, nor have any proof of his existence,
yep it's God.

>Ahem, Her existence. Let's not forget all human religions started as projections from matriarchial societies.

>So if some of us believe we can hear earthquakes in advance, have precognition, or other unusual experiences, why are we labeled kooks and nuts?

Scratch the bozos.

Seriously, a British theological scientist who died within the last few years wrote volumes on the coexistence of science and spirituality. Really, all you have to do is look up into the night sky. Why not get a nice, spirited discussion on the paranormal going. I'm up for it. And I'm not afraid of you scientists, either, so there. :-)

Cathryn